The International Conference on Computational Mathematics for Engineering Sciences and Healthcare (ICCMESH) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic quality, research integrity, and publication ethics. All submitted manuscripts will undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, transparency, and scientific excellence.
Initial Editorial Screening
Upon submission, each manuscript will be screened by the Editorial Committee to verify:
- Compliance with the conference formatting and submission guidelines.
- Relevance to the conference themes and scope.
- Completeness of the submission.
- Adherence to ethical and publication standards.
Manuscripts that fail to satisfy these preliminary requirements may be returned to the authors for correction or declined without external review.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial screening will be assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant research area. The identities of both the authors and reviewers will remain anonymous throughout the review process to ensure an unbiased evaluation.
Reviewers will assess each manuscript based on the following criteria:
- Originality and novelty of the research.
- Scientific and technical quality.
- Methodological rigor and correctness.
- Significance of the results.
- Relevance to the conference themes.
- Organization, clarity, and quality of presentation.
- Contribution to the advancement of computational mathematics, engineering sciences, healthcare, and interdisciplinary research.
Revision Process
Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the Editorial Committee will communicate one of the following decisions to the authors:
- Accept
- Accept with Minor Revisions
- Major Revisions Required
- Reject
Authors receiving revision requests will be expected to submit a revised manuscript together with a detailed response to the reviewers' comments within the prescribed timeline. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation whenever necessary.
Final Decision
The final decision regarding acceptance for presentation and publication will be made by the Editorial Committee after careful consideration of the reviewers' recommendations, the quality of the revised manuscript, and its overall contribution to the conference.
Only manuscripts that demonstrate scientific merit, originality, methodological soundness, and relevance to the conference scope will be accepted for publication in the conference proceedings.
Plagiarism and Publication Ethics
To uphold the highest standards of research integrity, all submitted manuscripts will be screened using Turnitin (or an equivalent plagiarism detection software) before acceptance.
Manuscripts with an overall similarity index not exceeding 10% (excluding references, quotations, and commonly used technical terminology) will be considered for publication. Submissions found to contain plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated data, or any other form of research misconduct will be rejected in accordance with internationally accepted publication ethics.
Editorial Standards
The Editorial Committee reserves the right to reject any manuscript that does not meet the scientific, ethical, or technical standards of the conference. Every effort will be made to ensure a fair, timely, confidential, and constructive review process that supports both authors and reviewers while maintaining the quality of the conference proceedings.
